Learn · 4 min read

The ESOP rules that actually bind you: Rule 12 in plain language

Rule 12 in one table

Approval
Shareholders’ resolution (ordinary, for private companies)
Minimum cliff
1 year between grant and first vesting — NO exceptions
Promoters
Ineligible, regardless of shareholding
Directors holding > 10%
Ineligible (direct + relatives + body corporates count)
Register
SH-6, maintained continuously

ESOPs feel informal — a promise in an offer letter. Legally they are anything but: Section 62(1)(b) and Rule 12 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules prescribe exactly how a scheme is created and who may benefit.

The scheme needs shareholder approval. For private companies an ordinary resolution suffices (a 2015 exemption; public companies need a special resolution and an MGT-14 filing). Separate approvals are needed for grants to employees of holding or subsidiary companies, and for any single-year grant of 1% or more of issued capital to one employee.

The eligibility exclusions are the part founders trip on. Promoters and members of the promoter group cannot receive ESOPs at all — their shareholding is irrelevant. Directors who hold more than 10% of equity — counting shares held by relatives and through body corporates — are also excluded. DPIIT-recognised startups have a window of exemption from these two exclusions, but it must actually apply and be documented.

And the cliff: at least one year must pass between grant and the first vesting. This is absolute. No scheme design, no board resolution, no exemption notification gets around it — a vesting schedule that starts earlier is simply invalid.

This explainer is general information, not legal or tax advice. Statutes change and facts differ — confirm decisions with a practising CS/CA.

Get the next explainer (and early access) by email:

← All explainers